Web21 Dec 2001 · He referred us to Percy v DPP [2001] EWHC Admin 1125, Hammond v DPP [2004] EWHC 69 Admin, and Dehal v CPS [2005] EWHC Admin 2154. He suggested that these authorities supported..... Request a trial to view additional results. 5 books & journal articles. Subject Index, Volume 76, 2003. Web24 Feb 2003 · 2. 1. This is an appeal by way of case stated by the appellant, Peter Sheldrake, against his conviction by justices in North East Essex on 26 June 200On that date he was convicted of being in charge of a motor vehicle on 9 February 2001 at Stanway after consuming so much alcohol that the proportion of alcohol in his breath exceeded the ...
Harvey v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 3992
Web30 Mar 2016 · Jones v DPP [2004] EWHC 236 (admin) When a driver is sent a notice to provide driver details, a reply in a covering letter is permissible provided it supplies all of the required information in a written form. Hayes v DPP [2004] EWHC 277 (QB) The duty to give driver information is compatible with the privilege against self-incrimination. Web13 Norwood v DPP [2003] EWHC 1564 (Admin), [2003] Crim LR 888. 14 Hammond v DPP [2004] EWHC 69 (Admin), (2004) 168 Justice of the Peace Reports 601. 15 Percy v DPP [2001] EWCA Admin 1125, [2002] Crim LR 835. 16 Blackstone’s para B11.56; Interpretation Act 1978, s 5 and sch 1. care house of the pee dee in florence sc
Harvey v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 3992
WebReynolds v Ipswich Crown Court [2004] EWHC 3271 (Admin) (9 December 2004) Reynolds, R v [2004] EWCA Crim 1834 (8 July 2004) Reynolds, R. v [2014] EWCA Crim 2205 (31 October 2014) Reynolds, R v [2016] EWCA Crim 2217 (13 December 2016) Reynolds v R [2024] EWCA Crim 57 (22 February 2024) Reynolds v R [2024] EWCA Crim 2145 (05 December 2024) WebLinkedIn. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of two protestors, Richardson and Wilkinson, for aggravated trespass. They had obstructed the trading activity of Ahava, a shop in Covent Garden, but were attempting to rely on the defence that the trading activity was itself unlawful. The Court’s dismissal of the appeal carries a clear ... Web4 Feb 2003 · 1. The case before me is an appeal by case stated from a decision of justices for the county of Hertford acting in and for the Petty Sessions Area of West Hertfordshire … care house of pontiac